Immunomodulators: Practice MCQs
30 practice questions with answers and explanations across 5 drug classes. All practice questions · Immunomodulators study guides · Download as flashcards (CSV)
Calcineurin inhibitors
Revise the Calcineurin inhibitors guide
What is the single mechanistic step that makes cyclosporine and tacrolimus one pharmacological class despite being chemically unrelated?
- Both are metabolised by the same hepatic enzyme
- Both immunophilin-drug complexes inhibit calcineurin, blocking NFAT-driven interleukin-2 gene transcription
- Both bind the same cell-surface cytokine receptor
- Both are B-cell-depleting antibodies
Show answer
Answer: B. Both immunophilin-drug complexes inhibit calcineurin, blocking NFAT-driven interleukin-2 gene transcription
Cyclosporine binds cyclophilin and tacrolimus binds FKBP-12, but both resulting complexes inhibit calcineurin, preventing NFAT dephosphorylation and blocking interleukin-2 transcription — the shared mechanistic endpoint that defines the class.
Why can Sandimmune and Neoral cyclosporine not be substituted for each other on a milligram-to-milligram basis?
- They are different drugs entirely
- Neoral has increased bioavailability compared with Sandimmune, so the two formulations are not bioequivalent
- Sandimmune is more potent than Neoral
- There is no clinically meaningful difference between them
Show answer
Answer: B. Neoral has increased bioavailability compared with Sandimmune, so the two formulations are not bioequivalent
The Neoral label states that Neoral has increased bioavailability compared with Sandimmune and that the two are not bioequivalent and cannot be used interchangeably.
Which food/drink interaction is specifically flagged for cyclosporine?
- Cranberry juice
- Grapefruit and grapefruit juice
- Orange juice
- Green tea
Show answer
Answer: B. Grapefruit and grapefruit juice
Grapefruit and grapefruit juice affect cyclosporine metabolism and increase its blood concentration, and the label directs that they should be avoided.
New-onset diabetes after transplant is a labelled risk most prominently associated with which calcineurin inhibitor in the material reviewed here?
- Cyclosporine
- Tacrolimus
- Neither drug
- Both equally, with identical labelled emphasis
Show answer
Answer: B. Tacrolimus
Tacrolimus's label specifically identifies new-onset diabetes after transplant as a risk, with African-American and Hispanic recipients at elevated risk, a labelled emphasis not carried in the same way by cyclosporine's label.
Why is therapeutic drug monitoring of trough blood concentrations central to using either calcineurin inhibitor safely?
- Because it is a regulatory formality with no clinical basis
- Because the gap between effective immunosuppression and nephrotoxic/neurotoxic levels is narrow for both drugs
- Because both drugs have no dose-related toxicity at all
- Because oral absorption of both drugs is always complete and predictable
Show answer
Answer: B. Because the gap between effective immunosuppression and nephrotoxic/neurotoxic levels is narrow for both drugs
Both drugs are dosed against measured whole-blood trough levels precisely because their toxic and effective ranges sit close together, which is what makes fixed dosing without monitoring unsafe.
Conventional DMARDs
Revise the Conventional DMARDs guide
A rheumatoid arthritis patient is found taking their methotrexate tablet every day instead of once a week. What is the clinical significance?
- None — methotrexate has a wide therapeutic index at any interval
- This is a recognised cause of severe, potentially fatal toxicity, and is exactly the error the label requires prescribers and pharmacists to warn against
- It only matters if the patient also takes NSAIDs
- Daily dosing is actually the correct schedule for rheumatoid arthritis
Show answer
Answer: B. This is a recognised cause of severe, potentially fatal toxicity, and is exactly the error the label requires prescribers and pharmacists to warn against
The label states plainly that mistaken daily use of the recommended weekly dose has led to fatal toxicity, and requires both physician and pharmacist to emphasise the weekly schedule.
Which conventional DMARD's boxed warning includes both teratogenicity and hepatotoxicity, with a distinct elimination procedure for its active metabolite?
- Hydroxychloroquine
- Sulfasalazine
- Leflunomide
- Methotrexate
Show answer
Answer: C. Leflunomide
Leflunomide's boxed warning pairs embryo-fetal toxicity with severe hepatotoxicity, and its long-lived active metabolite requires an accelerated elimination procedure with cholestyramine or activated charcoal when needed.
Why is hydroxychloroquine retinal screening performed before symptoms appear rather than after?
- Because the retinal damage is entirely reversible once caught
- Because irreversible damage can continue to progress even after the drug is stopped
- Because screening is only a regulatory formality with no clinical basis
- Because retinal toxicity always presents with pain, making screening unnecessary
Show answer
Answer: B. Because irreversible damage can continue to progress even after the drug is stopped
The point of screening is to catch dose-related retinal change before it becomes symptomatic, because progression can continue even after hydroxychloroquine is discontinued.
Which contraindication is specific to sulfasalazine and not shared by the rest of the conventional DMARD class?
- Pregnancy
- True sulfonamide or salicylate hypersensitivity
- Chronic liver disease
- Immunodeficiency syndromes
Show answer
Answer: B. True sulfonamide or salicylate hypersensitivity
Sulfasalazine is a sulfonamide-salicylate hybrid, so documented hypersensitivity to either chemistry is a contraindication specific to this drug within the class.
What is the mechanistic basis for calling methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and leflunomide a single class of "conventional synthetic DMARDs"?
- They all inhibit the same intracellular kinase
- They all bind the same cell-surface receptor
- They are grouped by being small synthetic molecules that predate the biologic and JAK-inhibitor era, not by a shared mechanism
- They are all metabolised by the same hepatic enzyme
Show answer
Answer: C. They are grouped by being small synthetic molecules that predate the biologic and JAK-inhibitor era, not by a shared mechanism
The csDMARD label is a historical and structural grouping — small synthetic molecules developed before biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs — rather than a statement about a common molecular target.
A patient on leflunomide develops a new nonproductive cough with worsening dyspnoea. What does this most urgently raise concern for?
- A benign, self-limiting side effect requiring no action
- Interstitial lung disease, a separately labelled and potentially fatal risk of leflunomide
- Normal drug-related fatigue
- An expected and harmless finding in all conventional DMARDs
Show answer
Answer: B. Interstitial lung disease, a separately labelled and potentially fatal risk of leflunomide
Leflunomide carries its own boxed-adjacent warning for interstitial lung disease, which may be fatal, and new or worsening respiratory symptoms warrant prompt medical evaluation.
Which statement about combining conventional DMARDs with other drug classes in rheumatoid arthritis is correct?
- Combining a conventional DMARD with a biologic DMARD is standard and considered safe
- Combining two biologic DMARDs together is standard practice
- A biologic DMARD is never combined with any conventional DMARD
- JAK inhibitors are always combined with a biologic DMARD
Show answer
Answer: A. Combining a conventional DMARD with a biologic DMARD is standard and considered safe
Classification sources describe combination of a biologic with a conventional DMARD such as methotrexate as standard practice, while combining two biologics, or a biologic with a JAK inhibitor, is not recommended.
Antimetabolite immunosuppressants
Revise the Antimetabolite immunosuppressants guide
Which statement correctly distinguishes the FDA-approved indications of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil?
- Both are FDA-approved for rheumatoid arthritis
- Azathioprine is FDA-approved for rheumatoid arthritis and transplant rejection prophylaxis; mycophenolate mofetil is approved only for transplant rejection prophylaxis
- Mycophenolate mofetil is FDA-approved for rheumatoid arthritis and azathioprine is not
- Neither drug has an FDA-approved indication outside oncology
Show answer
Answer: B. Azathioprine is FDA-approved for rheumatoid arthritis and transplant rejection prophylaxis; mycophenolate mofetil is approved only for transplant rejection prophylaxis
Azathioprine's label includes reduction of signs and symptoms of active rheumatoid arthritis as an indication, while mycophenolate mofetil's FDA-approved indications are limited to kidney, heart and liver transplant rejection prophylaxis.
What is the mechanistic basis for mycophenolic acid's claimed relative selectivity for lymphocytes?
- It binds a lymphocyte-specific cell-surface receptor
- Activated T and B lymphocytes depend more heavily on the de novo purine synthesis pathway that IMPDH inhibition blocks, compared with most other proliferating cells
- It is only absorbed into lymphocytes and no other cell type
- It has no selectivity and is equally toxic to all dividing cells
Show answer
Answer: B. Activated T and B lymphocytes depend more heavily on the de novo purine synthesis pathway that IMPDH inhibition blocks, compared with most other proliferating cells
Mycophenolic acid inhibits IMPDH in the de novo purine synthesis pathway, and lymphocytes rely on that pathway more than the salvage pathway compared with most other cell types, which is the stated basis for its relative lymphocyte selectivity.
A patient with absent TPMT activity is started on a conventional dose of azathioprine. What is the clinical concern?
- No concern — TPMT status is irrelevant to azathioprine dosing
- Severe, life-threatening myelotoxicity, since deaths from pancytopenia have been reported in this exact scenario
- Reduced drug efficacy only, with no safety implication
- Increased risk of teratogenicity specifically
Show answer
Answer: B. Severe, life-threatening myelotoxicity, since deaths from pancytopenia have been reported in this exact scenario
TPMT inactivates thiopurine metabolites; absent activity allows toxic metabolite accumulation at conventional doses, and death associated with pancytopenia has been reported in patients with absent TPMT activity receiving azathioprine.
Which drug interaction with azathioprine requires dose reduction because of a shared metabolic pathway?
- Allopurinol, which inhibits xanthine oxidase and raises azathioprine metabolite exposure
- Paracetamol, which has no relevant interaction
- Amoxicillin, which increases azathioprine absorption
- Omeprazole, which blocks azathioprine's hepatic conversion
Show answer
Answer: A. Allopurinol, which inhibits xanthine oxidase and raises azathioprine metabolite exposure
Allopurinol inhibits xanthine oxidase, one of azathioprine's clearance pathways, markedly raising exposure to the active thiopurine metabolites and requiring dose reduction if the combination is used.
What does mycophenolate mofetil's REMS programme specifically require?
- Annual liver biopsy for all patients
- Pregnancy testing and documented contraception for females of reproductive potential, before and during treatment
- Weekly chest X-rays
- Genetic testing for TPMT deficiency
Show answer
Answer: B. Pregnancy testing and documented contraception for females of reproductive potential, before and during treatment
Because of demonstrated teratogenicity and the quantified risk of first-trimester loss and congenital malformation, mycophenolate mofetil's REMS requires pregnancy testing before starting therapy and documented use of acceptable contraception throughout treatment and for six weeks after stopping.
Biologic DMARDs
Revise the Biologic DMARDs guide
Structurally, what distinguishes etanercept from infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab?
- Etanercept is a small molecule, the others are antibodies
- Etanercept is a soluble TNF-receptor fusion protein, the others are monoclonal antibodies against TNF-alpha
- All four are chemically identical monoclonal antibodies
- Etanercept is the only one given intravenously
Show answer
Answer: B. Etanercept is a soluble TNF-receptor fusion protein, the others are monoclonal antibodies against TNF-alpha
Etanercept is a dimeric fusion protein of the p75 TNF receptor's extracellular domain linked to IgG1 Fc, binding TNF-alpha and TNF-beta as a decoy receptor, whereas infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab are true monoclonal antibodies against TNF-alpha.
Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma has been reported most specifically with which combination?
- Etanercept alone in rheumatoid arthritis
- Infliximab or adalimumab plus azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine in adolescent/young adult male IBD patients
- Abatacept in elderly patients with COPD
- Rituximab in first-line rheumatoid arthritis
Show answer
Answer: B. Infliximab or adalimumab plus azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine in adolescent/young adult male IBD patients
The signal is concentrated in infliximab- or adalimumab-treated adolescent and young adult males with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis who were also taking a thiopurine; etanercept's label does not carry the same language.
Which set of boxed warnings belongs to rituximab rather than to the TNF inhibitors?
- Serious infection including tuberculosis, and paediatric malignancy
- Fatal infusion-related reactions, severe mucocutaneous reactions, hepatitis B reactivation, and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy
- Embryofetal toxicity and hepatotoxicity
- Major adverse cardiovascular events and thrombosis
Show answer
Answer: B. Fatal infusion-related reactions, severe mucocutaneous reactions, hepatitis B reactivation, and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy
Rituximab's boxed warnings are infusion-reaction, mucocutaneous-reaction, HBV-reactivation and PML risks — a distinct hazard profile from the TB/malignancy warning shared by the TNF inhibitors.
What happened in trials when abatacept was combined with a TNF antagonist?
- Serious infections fell compared with TNF-antagonist monotherapy
- Serious infections rose from 0.8% to 4.4% compared with TNF-antagonist monotherapy
- No difference in infection rates was observed
- The combination improved efficacy with no added risk
Show answer
Answer: B. Serious infections rose from 0.8% to 4.4% compared with TNF-antagonist monotherapy
Concomitant intravenous abatacept and a TNF antagonist produced more infections (63% vs 43%) and more serious infections (4.4% vs 0.8%) than TNF-antagonist monotherapy, which is why the combination is not recommended.
A patient is being considered for rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis. What does its FDA label require to have already happened?
- Nothing — rituximab is first-line therapy
- An inadequate response to one or more TNF antagonist therapies, with rituximab then used in combination with methotrexate
- Prior treatment with abatacept specifically
- A positive tuberculosis test
Show answer
Answer: B. An inadequate response to one or more TNF antagonist therapies, with rituximab then used in combination with methotrexate
Rituximab's RA indication is written for patients with moderately to severely active disease and an inadequate response to one or more TNF antagonists, used in combination with methotrexate.
Which biologic DMARD in this class is the only one with no absolute contraindication listed in its own FDA label?
- Etanercept
- Infliximab
- Abatacept
- Rituximab
Show answer
Answer: C. Abatacept
Abatacept's labelling states there are no absolute contraindications, unlike etanercept (contraindicated in sepsis) or infliximab (dose ceiling in heart failure, prior severe hypersensitivity).
Why is tuberculosis screening required before starting a TNF inhibitor or abatacept?
- Because these drugs are directly toxic to Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- Because they interfere with immune surveillance that normally contains latent TB, and patients on this class have frequently presented with disseminated or extrapulmonary disease
- Because TB screening is only a billing requirement with no clinical basis
- Because TNF inhibitors cure latent TB on their own
Show answer
Answer: B. Because they interfere with immune surveillance that normally contains latent TB, and patients on this class have frequently presented with disseminated or extrapulmonary disease
TNF and T-cell costimulation are part of the immune response that contains latent tuberculosis; blocking them allows reactivation, and patients affected have frequently presented atypically with disseminated or extrapulmonary disease.
JAK inhibitors
Revise the JAK inhibitors guide
What structurally distinguishes JAK inhibitors from biologic DMARDs?
- JAK inhibitors are injectable proteins like biologics
- JAK inhibitors are oral small molecules that block intracellular signalling, while biologics are typically proteins that bind an extracellular target
- JAK inhibitors have no immunosuppressive effect
- There is no meaningful difference between the two categories
Show answer
Answer: B. JAK inhibitors are oral small molecules that block intracellular signalling, while biologics are typically proteins that bind an extracellular target
JAK inhibitors are oral small molecules that block the intracellular JAK-STAT signalling relay downstream of the cytokine receptor, whereas biologic DMARDs are typically proteins acting on an extracellular target such as TNF-alpha or CD20.
Which JAK inhibitor was the drug actually studied in the ORAL Surveillance trial that produced the class's boxed warning?
- Baricitinib
- Upadacitinib
- Tofacitinib
- All three were studied together in one arm
Show answer
Answer: C. Tofacitinib
ORAL Surveillance was a postmarketing safety trial of tofacitinib specifically, comparing it against TNF blockers in RA patients 50 years or older with a cardiovascular risk factor; baricitinib and upadacitinib were not the drugs studied.
What do the baricitinib and upadacitinib labels say about their own MACE and mortality risk relative to tofacitinib's trial findings?
- That the risk is proven to be identical to tofacitinib's
- That these two drugs have not been studied in a trial of comparable size, so the risk has not been adequately evaluated for them specifically
- That these two drugs are proven safer than tofacitinib
- That the boxed warning does not apply to them
Show answer
Answer: B. That these two drugs have not been studied in a trial of comparable size, so the risk has not been adequately evaluated for them specifically
Both labels state plainly that they have not been studied in a trial similar to the large tofacitinib safety trial, so the corresponding risk has not been adequately evaluated for baricitinib or upadacitinib even though the same boxed-warning language appears.
Which of the following is a labelled restriction specific to tofacitinib rather than the whole JAK-inhibitor class?
- A requirement for lipid monitoring
- The higher-dose regimens are not recommended for RA, PsA, AS or pcJIA
- A requirement for latent TB testing
- Monitoring for neutropenia
Show answer
Answer: B. The higher-dose regimens are not recommended for RA, PsA, AS or pcJIA
The dose-based restriction against the higher tofacitinib regimens for these specific indications is unique to tofacitinib's label, reflecting the dose-related risk pattern seen in ORAL Surveillance.
In ORAL Surveillance, the increased lung cancer rate with tofacitinib was specifically observed in which subgroup?
- All patients regardless of smoking history
- Current or past smokers
- Only patients under 50
- Only patients never exposed to a TNF blocker
Show answer
Answer: B. Current or past smokers
The label specifies a higher rate of lung cancers in current or past smokers treated with tofacitinib compared with TNF blockers, a subgroup-specific rather than a uniform finding.
Which pharmacokinetic property most differentiates baricitinib from tofacitinib and upadacitinib within this class?
- Baricitinib is eliminated primarily by the kidney, while the other two rely mainly on hepatic CYP3A4 metabolism
- Baricitinib is not absorbed orally
- Baricitinib has no monitoring requirements
- Baricitinib is a biologic protein, not a small molecule
Show answer
Answer: A. Baricitinib is eliminated primarily by the kidney, while the other two rely mainly on hepatic CYP3A4 metabolism
Baricitinib's elimination is predominantly renal, which is why renal function rather than CYP3A4-mediated drug interactions is its principal dose-adjustment driver, unlike tofacitinib and upadacitinib.